Save Our Service! Rally to Win the Transit Funding We Need

image description: graphic has group of transit activists holding “Transit for All PA!” signs with fists up and text atht says “Save our Service! Rally for transit funding to serve our communities April 29 1:30-2:30 955 Penn Ave, 15222”

SOS! Stop the cuts! Stop the fare hikes! It’s time to SAVE OUR SERVICE and win transit funding to move us all!!

Devastating cuts of up to 35% of our bus and T service and 62% of ACCESS services have been proposed to take effect in Allegheny County if the Pennsylvania state legislature fails to pass new funding for transit for next year. The impact of these cuts would be staggering- for riders, for our economy and businesses, for our region’s road congestion and air quality. Bus lines are lifelines, and our lifelines are on life support.

Riders, transit workers and Allegheny County elected officials are standing together to say, “NOT ON OUR WATCH!”

On the first day of Pittsburgh Regional Transit’s first public hearing on the funding crisis, Transit for All PA!, Pittsburghers for Public Transit and Mobilify Southwestern Pennsylvania are cohosting a rally and press conference outside the David L. Lawrence Convention Center.

Join transit riders and workers, County Executive Sara Innamorato, Pittsburgh Regional Transit CEO Katherine Kelleman, the Pittsburgh Downtown Partnership and the Allegheny County Pennsylvania state delegation to show that we are united in the fight for state funding, for the transit service we deserve!

Riders can learn more about the proposed cuts and PRT’s Public Comment Period here

How Will Pittsburgh Mayoral Candidates Improve Transit Access?

image description: text reads “#VoteTransit Mayoral Questionnaire Candidate Responses” with photo of 4 candidates running for mayor.

Read what the Candidates running to be PGH’s next Mayor have to say about public transit. Take our #VoteTransit Pledge to commit to electing a transit champion!

With Election Day around the corner on May 20th, city residents will have the chance to choose who should be the next Mayor of Pittsburgh. We at Pittsburghers for Public Transit know that there is a lot that City and municipal leaders can do to improve access to public transit – from improving sidewalks, to building bus shelters, to creating land use and employee policy that support transit access – even though the Mayor doesn’t have direct control over the transit agency itself.

This year, we put together our #VoteTransit 25/25/25 Goal for candidates running to lead our city–and we want them to commit!

Pittsburghers for Public Transit’s Transit 25/25/25 Goals:

Mayoral and City Council candidates must pledge to:

  • Close 25% of the City’s Sidewalk Network Gaps 
  • Install 25 New Bus Shelters Per Year
  • Ensure 25% of the New Housing Units Built Near Our Best Transit Assets are Deeply Affordable 

Pittsburghers for Public Transit held a Mayoral Forum on April 9th (which was attended by all candidates except Corey O’Connor) and we issued a short two-question questionnaire for written responses included below. Read on to learn what each candidate said about our goal to build more bus shelters, better sidewalks, and more deeply affordable housing near great transit.

Join more than 2,000 people who’ve taken the #VoteTransit pledge to vote for a *Transit Champion* on Election Day!

Pittsburghers for Public Transit’s #VoteTransit Questionnaire, as answered by Democratic candidates for Mayor of Pittsburgh

1. Do you agree with the #VoteTransit 25/25/25 Goals? If not, what targets would you set as Mayor in this coming term around sidewalk network gap closure, new bus shelter deployment, and the development of more units of affordable housing by the busways, T and our frequent service corridors?

Mayor Ed Gainey

I agree with these goals. From the beginning of my administration, I have stood with transit riders, bike/ped advocates, and everyone in our community who has a vision of how to make equitable mobility a reality in our city. These goals are a powerful next step that have been created by people directly impacted by these issues and I look forward to working with you to implement them.

Corey O’Connor

Yes, I agree with the goals above. Closing sidewalk gaps, adding additional bus shelters, and building more deeply affordable housing near transit would all work together to make our city a safer, more accessible, and more pleasant place to live.

2. For the targets that you are proposing, what are your specific plans to fund and implement the sidewalk network gap closure, install the new bus shelters per year, and ensure housing by transit is affordable? What are the obstacles that you see in meeting your goals, and how would you overcome them?

Mayor Ed Gainey

Sidewalks: When it comes to sidewalks in our city, we have an archaic system that places responsibility for sidewalk maintenance with the property owner. This means that property owners in wealthier communities are better able to keep their sidewalks in good repair than people in lower-income communities. My administration has begun to
address this issue with a pilot program that uses city resources to replace large sections of sidewalk – which is more cost effective than having a single property owner replace their own sidewalk – then bills that back to the property owner at cost, and on a payment plan as needed. Not only is it less expensive for the property owner, it allows
large sections of sidewalk gap to be repaired at once and increases equitable access to ccessible sidewalks.

Because of this system, as well as the City’s funding constraints over the next two years, closing 25% of the sidewalk network gap will require creativity, persistence, and partnership. Cities like Denver, with its sidewalk fee, are coming up with innovative ways to repair sidewalks and fill gaps. I’d like to work with Pittsburghers for Public Transit, the Department of Mobility and Infrastructure, and City Council to consider solutions to come up with the revenue necessary to close this gap over the next four years.

Bus shelters: One way to potentially identify the revenue necessary to create 25 new shelters per year would be for the city to take over shelters from Gateway and start bringing in that ad revenue ourselves – then using that to install more shelters.

Affordable Housing: We can only achieve the goal of 25% of new units near our best transit assets being deeply affordable if we create deep partnerships between the Urban Redevelopment Authority, the Housing Authority, and our other affordable housing partners. My administration has modeled how this is possible by creating and
preserving 2,000 units of affordable housing in our first term and beginning a process to reshape the Housing Authority. My administration also has bills currently before the Planning Commission and City Council both for transit-oriented development as well as Inclusionary Zoning, which would require that 10% of all housing built in our high-density zones, including transit corridors, be affordable. It’s proving to be a battle because many of our market-rate developers and their allies on City Council simply don’t want to participate in that – no matter how many tax breaks and density incentives we offer to let them build more and make more money. We’ll continue to move toward this goal using all our resources; from organizing ordinary Pittsburghers in every neighborhood to continuing to demonstrate the effectiveness of our affordable housing development. In a second term, I hope to partner with PPT to select a set of transit stations or neighborhoods with best-in-class transit to create flagship projects that demonstrate to the city what a transit-oriented future will look like.

Corey O’Connor

Meeting these ambitious goals will require a combination of local investment, state grants, and innovative funding mechanisms, as obtaining federal funds under the current administration will be challenging. For sidewalk gap closures, I’d prioritize city capital funds and public-private partnerships, focusing on high-traffic areas. A major obstacle will be private property owners’ reluctance to take on legal responsibility, as the city must sign agreements with each owner before making improvements. Bus shelter installations can be streamlined by working with transit agencies and leveraging private sponsorships or advertising revenue. To ensure affordable housing near transit, I support investing in site preparation, making permitting easier, and expanding financial incentives to accelerate construction. The key obstacles are funding constraints and bureaucratic delays, which I’d address through more efficient permitting processes and targeted investment strategies.

Pittsburghers for Public Transit’s #VoteTransit Questionnaire, as answered by Republican candidates for Mayor of Pittsburgh

1. Do you agree with the #VoteTransit 25/25/25 Goals? If not, what targets would you set as Mayor in this coming term around sidewalk network gap closure, new bus shelter deployment, and the development of more units of affordable housing by the busways, T and our frequent service corridors?

Thomas West

I agree with the intent behind these goals — making Pittsburgh safer, more connected, and more affordable for working families — but I also believe in setting realistic, fiscally responsible targets that reflect our city’s current budget constraints and economic challenges.

  • Sidewalk Network Gaps: Sidewalks are not just about safety — they’re a fundamental part of our city’s infrastructure and directly impact quality of life. I support the goal of closing 25% of network gaps, but more importantly, I believe we must prioritize neighborhoods with the highest need first — particularly those with schools, senior populations, and high pedestrian traffic. These communities can’t afford to be left behind.
  • Bus Shelters: With PRT facing financial instability and possible service cuts, our first priority must be preserving access to reliable, functional transit. Once that stability is addressed, I would support a goal of installing up to 25 new shelters annually, but only if we can ensure each one is placed where it’s actually needed — not just to hit a number.
  • Affordable Housing Near Transit: I do not support mandates that dictate where or what type of housing must be built. I believe in incentivizing development and creating conditions where affordable housing can thrive organically — not through one-size-fits-all policies. We need to focus on neighborhood revitalization
    that drives private investment, job creation, and ultimately, homeownership — not just rental units stacked by transit stops.

Tony Moreno

[no response]

2. For the targets that you are proposing, what are your specific plans to fund and implement the sidewalk network gap closure, install the new bus shelters per year, and ensure housing by transit is affordable? What are the obstacles that you see in meeting your goals, and how would you overcome them?

Thomas West

  • Sidewalks: The City of Pittsburgh has mismanaged millions in taxpayer dollars over the years — it’s time to get back to the basics. As Mayor, I will audit current infrastructure spending and identify waste to reallocate funds to critical priorities like sidewalks. I will also pursue public-private partnerships and state/federal infrastructure grants — but every dollar must be accountable. No more throwing money at problems without a plan or a result.
  • Bus Shelters & Transit Support: With PRT facing a fiscal cliff, I will be a vocal advocate in Harrisburg and Washington. Philadelphia has a seat at the table — Pittsburgh needs one too. But while we fight for funding, we must also ensure that current transit dollars are used efficiently. Every shelter should be placed based on data — ridership, need, and accessibility — not political pressure. We must stop chasing headlines and start chasing results.
  • Affordable Housing: We don’t need more top-down mandates. What we need is economic opportunity in every corner of the city. That starts with cutting red tape for small businesses, investing in workforce development, and supporting local entrepreneurs. When you bring jobs into underserved neighborhoods, you create demand for housing — and that’s when developers step in. My goal is to create environments where affordable housing is a market-driven result of growth, not a politically dictated outcome.

Tony Moreno

[no response]

May 20 is election day! Make sure you’re registered to vote and take the pledge to elect a Transit Champion on our #Vote Transit Page!

#VoteTransit 25/25/25 Goal for Mayoral & City Council Candidates

Pittsburghers for Public Transit (PPT) Calls on Pittsburgh Mayoral and City Council Candidates to Adopt PPT’s 25/25/25 Goals and Develop a Plan for Implementation 

Pittsburghers for Public Transit’s Transit 25/25/25 Goals call on Mayoral and City Council candidates to:

  1. Close 25% of the City’s Sidewalk Network Gaps 
  2. Install 25 New Bus Shelters Per Year
  3. Ensure 25% of the New Housing Units Built Near Our Best Transit Assets are Deeply Affordable 

The Transit 25/25/25 Goals around sidewalks, bus shelters, and affordable, higher-density housing by our best transit assets are continuations of the equitable infrastructure campaign work that members of Pittsburghers for Public Transit have been leading for the last several years. 

Pittsburgh’s lack of connected, accessible and maintained sidewalks often creates access and safety barriers to transit for disabled riders and families. Improving the conditions of our sidewalks was named as one of the top priorities for residents during the transition planning process for Mayor Gainey’s administration in 2021.

Pittsburgh is also nationally notable for how few bus shelters are installed at bus stops, which forces riders to be exposed to the elements and make them less visible and less safe while waiting for the bus. The responsibility for bus shelters falls exclusively on the City of Pittsburgh within its jurisdiction, not on Pittsburgh Regional Transit, and there is a backlog of over 230 stops within the City that have ridership high enough to justify a shelter that are currently unprotected.

Finally, the Pittsburgh affordable housing crisis has displaced thousands of residents far from the City into County municipalities with low access to jobs, critical amenities, and transit. This affordable housing crisis has particularly affected Black and brown families and transit riders; it is imperative that our City has a holistic policy and funding solution to ensure that more low-income riders can live by the transportation assets that they rely on.

Pittsburghers for Public Transit has long elevated the role of Pittsburgh’s Mayor and City Council leaders in improving – or impeding – access to quality transit. 

In 2021 PPT published the Pittsburgh 100 Day Transit Platform in collaboration with dozens of residents and organizations that have strong insights into what is needed to ensure Pittsburgh’s transportation network is effective, safe, and accessible to all. This platform laid out four broad mobility goals for the City, and several specific policy demands to achieve a more effective, equitable mobility network that works for all residents. 

In 2022, we followed up with our Representing our Routes report, which laid out the quality and reliability of transit service, the demographics of ridership, and the number of bus shelters in each City Council district. In this report, we also detailed the direct and advocacy roles that Pittsburgh City Council members can and must play in improving transit service and infrastructure.

Finally, in 2024 we organized and won the first City budget line item for transit amenities, ensuring that there were resources to begin to close the gaps on the 230+ bus stops that have ridership that is high enough to warrant a shelter, but in which no shelter has been installed. It is long overdue for the City to put attention and resources towards this need, and there must be a process to continue and grow this work.

What power do the City of Pittsburgh’s elected leaders have to improve public transit access?

The Mayor & City Council can improve transit access through their power to shape;

  • Policies around Land Use, Zoning, and Affordable Housing Development
  • Infrastructure Projects like sidewalks, bus shelters, and bus lanes
  • City Department staffing and employee policy
  • City Budgets

World-class cities like Pittsburgh should strive for excellence, provide better opportunities for citizens, and afford residents the freedom to improve their lives. Affordable, accessible, quality public transit is central to achieving these goals.

Although many believe that transit is exclusively within the purview of the Pittsburgh Regional Transit, and is governed solely by our county and state legislators, the power of local governments to bring big improvements for transit riders should not be underestimated. Elevating public transit requires that Pittsburgh elected officials invest in sidewalks, bus shelters, and safe street infrastructure like crosswalks and curb cuts, and that we plan for development that supports more affordable housing and critical amenities by quality transit.

Mass transit provides freedom of movement to those with the least amount of access. Recent Census numbers tell us that 23% of Pittsburgh households do not have access to a private vehicle. They also show that 50,000 Pittsburghers – more than 17% of our City’s population – use public transit to commute to work every day. Add students, the unemployed, and other noncommuters, and the actual number of transit riders is much higher. 

The City of Pittsburgh Council and the Mayor’s office are responsible for many of the critical land use policies, infrastructure investments, and staffing decisions that can make public transit safe and effective. This is done in part through the City’s zoning and planning laws, which set the rules for how our City is developed. For instance, zoning rules define whether low-income residents can find affordable housing by great transit assets like the East Busway and the T, and high-frequency routes like the 16, 51, 61s, 86, 87, 71s, 91, and more.

The City is also responsible for the built environment and sidewalk infrastructure that allows all transit riders, regardless of self-mobility concerns, to safely and comfortably get to and from bus stops. From bus shelters to street lighting, ADA-compliant sidewalks, curb cuts, and crosswalks, the ability to access transit is almost entirely dependent on decisions made by our City. Decisions to paint bus-only lanes and to install traffic signals that turn green for buses ensure that transit is reliable and timely, and ensure that we are prioritizing 40-passenger vehicles over single cars on our roads.

The Mayor and City Council also propose and approve operating budgets and appoints Department heads to manage City staff time that can ensure the prioritization and implementation of these types of transit infrastructure improvements.

You can join Pittsburghers for Public Transit (PPT) call on Pittsburgh Mayoral and City Council Candidates to adopt PPT’s 25/25/25 Goals by pledging to #VoteTransit on May 20, 2025:

#VoteTransit Mayoral Candidate Forum on April 9th

image description: Flyer for #VoteTransit Mayoral Candidate Forum, 4/9, 7-8:30p, 4836 Ellsworth Ave as photos of each of the 4 candidates & the PPT logo

Pittsburghers for Public Transit’s #VoteTransit Mayoral Candidate Forum and “Transit 25/25/25 Goal” for all candidates running to be our municipal leaders.

Español Abajo

There is a lot that the city can do to improve access to public transit – from sidewalks, to bus stops, to housing policy – and this year, 4 candidates are running to be our next Mayor. Join transit advocates from across the city to learn these candidates’ plans for transit if they are elected to office. Pittsburghers for Public Transit has issued the Transit 25/25/25 Goal for candidates in this year’s city race. Now it’s time to learn whether candidates adopt it and seriously consider their role in improving our transit access.

Join PPT’s #VoteTransit Pittsburgh Mayoral Candidate Forum
April 9, 7-8:30pm
4836 Ellsworth Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15213


Pittsburghers for Public Transit (PPT) Calls on Pittsburgh Mayoral and City Council Candidates to Adopt PPT’s 25/25/25 Goals and Develop a Plan for Implementation 

Pittsburghers for Public Transit’s Transit 25/25/25 Goals:

Mayoral and City Council candidates must pledge to:

  • Close 25% of the City’s Sidewalk Network Gaps 
  • Install 25 New Bus Shelters Per Year
  • Ensure 25% of the New Housing Units Built Near Our Best Transit Assets are Deeply Affordable 

The Transit 25/25/25 Goals around sidewalks, bus shelters, and affordable, higher-density housing by our best transit assets are continuations of the equitable infrastructure campaign work that members of Pittsburghers for Public Transit have been leading for the last several years. 

Pittsburgh’s lack of connected, accessible and maintained sidewalks often creates access and safety barriers to transit for disabled riders and families. Improving the conditions of our sidewalks was named as one of the top priorities for residents during the transition planning process for Mayor Gainey’s administration in 2021.

Pittsburgh is also nationally notable for how few bus shelters are installed at bus stops, which forces riders to be exposed to the elements and make them less visible and less safe while waiting for the bus. The responsibility for bus shelters falls exclusively on the City of Pittsburgh within its jurisdiction, not on Pittsburgh Regional Transit, and there is a backlog of over 230 stops within the City that have ridership high enough to justify a shelter that are currently unprotected.

Finally, the Pittsburgh affordable housing crisis has displaced thousands of residents far from the City into County municipalities with low access to jobs, critical amenities, and transit. This affordable housing crisis has particularly affected Black and brown families and transit riders; it is imperative that our City has a holistic policy and funding solution to ensure that more low-income riders can live by the transportation assets that they rely on.


La ciudad puede hacer mucho para mejorar el acceso al transporte público, desde aceras y paradas de autobús hasta políticas de vivienda. Este año, cuatro candidatos se postulan para ser nuestro próximo alcalde. Únase a los defensores del transporte público de toda la ciudad para conocer los planes de estos candidatos si son elegidos.

Todos están invitados a unirse a PPT para este Foro de la Alcaldía, que organizamos durante nuestra Asamblea General Mensual. Aprovechamos nuestras reuniones mensuales para informar sobre las campañas actuales, debatir estrategias y tácticas, capacitar en nuevas habilidades y construir comunidad. La reunión de este mes será híbrida. Únase a nosotros en persona en 4836 Ellsworth Ave o en línea a través de Zoom.

6pm-7pm Hora para socializar // 7pm-8:3pm Foro de candidates.

National Transit Advocacy Spring Training

image description: text reads “National Transit Advocacy Spring Training, April 25-25, 2025 Pittsburgh, PA” with emojies of a raised fit, PPT’s icon, and a red heart. Photos of PPT members at rallies, parties, and canvass days.

Get your tickets today! Join riders and workers from across the US at the National Transit Advocacy Spring Training, April 25th and 26th in Pittsburgh, PA!

 

Get ready for the 2025 National Transit Advocacy Spring Training! Riders, workers and transit supporters from across the country will meet in Pittsburgh, PA April 25th and 26th and YOU are invited!

Transit can transform our communities – but it is up to us as organizers to build the grassroots movement to make it happen!

This April, you are invited to join Pittsburghers for Public Transit and advocates from across the City, County State, and Nation at our second annual National Transit Advocacy Spring Training. We will have workshops on telling a compelling transit story to elected leaders and using it to win your demands; transit worker organizing and building common cause with riders; taking transit service demands into a state funding fight; galvanizing municipal elected officials to support transit riders with land use and infrastructure demands… and more! This organizing training day will have workshops led by local advocates and advocates outside of Pittsburgh, and will have topics relevant to transit organizers at all levels and all regions.

We will host a pre-training day Transit Tour and happy hour on Fri, April 25th, and then have a morning plenary, workshops and a mobile tour throughout the day Saturday April 26th. Space is limited and pre-registration is required for Friday evening’s Transit Tour. A bus pass will be provided for your adventure with us! You do NOT need to attend the Transit Tour to join us at happy hour, where you’ll enjoy a complimentary beverage and hors d’oeuvres. On Saturday you can expect continental breakfast, hot lunches and afternoon snacks.

Last day to register for Spring Training is Friday 4/18/25.


Quick Look at Schedule and Locations

(See the full workshop details & presenter bios at the bottom of this page)

Friday, April 25th:
Transit Tour and Welcome Happy Hour
Aslin Beer Company

Saturday, April 26th
Courtyard Pittsburgh University Center
100 Lytton Ave., Pittsburgh PA, 15213

  • 8:00-9:00 AM // Check-in
  • 8:30-9:00 AM // Continental breakfast and Networking
  • 9:00-10:00 AM // Opening Plenary
  • 10:15 AM – 11:45 AM // Workshop Block 1, advocates choose from:
    • Developing Strong Transit Worker-Rider Alliances
    • Sharing Your Transit Story: Effectively Using Your Story to Mobilize
  • 12:00-1:00 PM // Lunch (provided with RSVP)
  • 1:00-2:30 PM // Workshop Block 2, advocates choose from:
    • Identifying Power in Your Personal Networks: Spidermapping
    • MI, MD and PA Case Studies: Statewide Funding Fights for the Transit Service we Deserve
    • Let’s go for a walk! (Mobile Workshop – space limited, pre-registration required)
  • 2:45 – 4:15 PM // Workshop Block 3, advocates choose from:
    • How to Facilitate Excellent Community Meetings and Navigate Conflict in the Moment
    • Campaigns 101: The Nuts and Bolts of Building a Winning Strategy
  • 4:15 – 4:30 PM // BREAK Refreshments and Snacks
  • 4:30 – 5:00 PM // Closing Statements and Farewell
  • 5:00 – 5:30 PM // Social Time

Logistics

Location Information

The Courtyard Pittsburgh University Center is located at 100 Lytton Ave, Pittsburgh PA 15213, in the amenity-rich Oakland neighborhood.

The hotel is very easily accessible from the airport via public transit. It is about a four-minute walk or roll from the Fifth Ave and Tennyson Ave PRT stop, which is serviced by the following routes:

  • 54 Northside-Oakland-Southside
  • 58 Greenfield
  • 61A North Braddock
  • 61B Braddock-Swissvale
  • 61C McKeesport-Homestead
  • 61D Murray
  • 67 Monroeville
  • 69 Trafford
  • 71A Negley
  • 71B Highland Park
  • 71C Point Breeze
  • 71D Hamilton
  • 75 Ellsworth
  • 81 Oak Hill
  • 83 Bedford Hill
  • 93 Lawrenceville-Hazelwood
  • P3 East Busway-Oakland

If any of these transportation modes are cost-prohibitive for you, contact PPT to discuss options, at 551-206-3320 or info@pittsburghforpublictransit.org by April 23, 2025.

Accessibility Information

The Courtyard Pittsburgh University Center has accessible onsite parking and an accessible main entrance. All meeting areas are accessible, and there are elevators throughout the building. More information about their accessibility features can be found on their web page.

Food and Drink:

At happy hour on Friday let PPT buy your first round! There will be hors d’oeuvres too! Food will be brought out before 6pm (if you arrive on the later side there is no guarantee there will be food left). If you are curious about Aslin Beer Company’s menu you can take a look at it here.

On Saturday, PPT will provide a continental breakfast for participants in the morning, lunch, and snacks towards the end of the day.

PPT will label provided food with common allergens.

COVID-19 Procedures: 

Masks are encouraged indoors at our events and will be available on-site at check-in. We also encourage everyone to take an at-home COVID-19 rapid test before arriving. Please stay home if you are feeling sick or have come into contact with someone who has COVID-19. The Courtyard Pittsburgh University Center has on-site parking, elevators, and accessible public entrances.


National Transit Advocacy Training Workshops and Presenters

Friday, 4/25
3:30pm Transit Tour, 5-7pm Kick-off Happy Hour

Transit Tour and Spring Training Kick-off Happy Hour
Kick-off Happy Hour at Aslin Beer, 1801 Smallman St
Pre-Kickoff Transit Tour, 3:30 start @ 4836 Ellsworth
Transit Tour led by:

Pittsburghers for Public Transit is excited to welcome public transit advocates, transit riders and workers, movement leaders, and champions for the freedom of movement to our Spring Training this year! Let’s get moving. 

Come on a transit tour tailored just for you! PPT members guide us on a transit tour beginning at the Pittsburghers for Public Transit office and ending near our final destination in time for a happy hour mixer at Aslin Beer Company, from 5:00-7:00pm with our members and friends. Our guides lead us through local landmarks, service itself, our geography’s impact on modes of transit, and PPT’s vision of all the potential our system could hold.

We invite our local and visiting guests to mingle before the big day of workshops. Join us for chit-chat, cocktails, hor d’evours, and table activities at Aslin Beer Company in The Strip District. The first round is on us! #TGIF 

Saturday, 4/26
10:15 AM – 11:45 AM // Workshop Block 1, advocates choose from:

Developing Strong Transit Worker-Rider Alliances Across Campaigns
Workshop led by

In this workshop, led by Pittsburghers for Public Transit’s 2025 Transit Worker Fellows, you will learn concrete strategies for collaborating with transit workers. Explore why this community matters, their viewpoints, common threads of solidarity, navigating concerns when collaborating and how to bring compassion to a campaign composed of diverse perspectives. 

The Transit Worker Fellows will open the workshop with a panel,  sharing their work and organizing experiences, illustrating the value workers bring to conversations that we cannot get from just engaging riders. 

Following the panel you will break into small groups to discuss different scenarios and conflicts that may arise between riders and workers, transit agencies and riders, transit agencies and workers. Then construct and practice organizing conversations. The groups will come together and end with reflections.

Sharing Your Transit Story: Effectively Using Your Story to Mobilize
Workshop led by

When advocating for change, it’s easy to get caught up in data, reports, and studies to try to prove the worthiness of your cause—but that only gets you so far. Time and time again, we have seen powerful stories help shift narratives around issues, including transit. Whether it’s testifying at city council, speaking to reporters, or educating people around the issues, storytelling can be our most powerful tool in creating change.

In this workshop we will learn how stories can have an impact and discuss effective ways to tell our stories to shift narratives and win change.

1:00-2:30 PM // Workshop Block 2, advocates choose from:

Identifying Power in Your Personal Networks: Spidermapping 
Workshop led by

When building an issues-based campaign, it is important to consider what the stakes are for the community around you. Whether it is where you volunteer, your classmates, your church congregation, neighbors, or co-workers, helping people to realize the power of their personal networks is life-changing to the personal power of organizing in your community. The power we all have, organizing it, and understanding the power of our opposition is what we will be focused on in this workshop. As we look to build powerful people, relationships, and movements to address our material needs.

Join us for a workshop where we will help you realize YOUR power and send you on your way to organize for your community’s gain.

MI, MD and PA Case Studies: Statewide Funding Fights for the Transit Service we Deserve
Workshop led by

Transit riders in communities across the Country are facing massive service cuts and fare increases – or are already suffering from inadequate service- and are now organizing for a variety of statewide funding and policy solutions. Hear from organizers from Detroit, Baltimore and Philly around the good, the bad and the ugly around statewide funding fights for transit, and how we can draw lessons from funding fights across state lines and across issue areas to win the service we deserve. 

Let’s go for a walk! (Mobile Workshop)
Workshop led by

Get some fresh air after lunch on a walk to explore Oakland from the perspective of people who walk and bus there! We’ll venture outside for a comfortable 1.3-mile journey with a focus on what works and what could be improved for accessibility, safety, and comfort. The route is mostly flat with one moderately steep downhill section, all on paved surfaces with wheelchair-accessible sidewalks.

Along the way, we’ll examine sidewalk design, transit stations, a pedestrian plaza, and one of the best “complete streets” in the City. You’ll learn to assess walking infrastructure through the eyes of mobility and accessibility experts, with insights from special guest Cecelia Black from Disability Rights Washington.

This interactive 90-minute workshop includes a brief orientation, guided walk with discussion stops, and a group debrief. Pre-registration required, limited to 20 participants. Come prepared to move at a relaxed pace and engage in meaningful dialogue about creating more walkable, accessible communities!

2:45 – 4:15 PM // Workshop Block 3, advocates choose from:

How to Facilitate Excellent Community Meetings and Navigate Conflict in the Moment
Workshop led by

As community organizers, we have all found ourselves in community meetings which have gone sideways- with attendees who pull everyone off-topic, folks that don’t seem engaged, participants who offer racist, homophobic or ableist takes, and even some where participants challenge the goals of the meeting itself. This workshop will share best practices for how facilitators can set up effective meetings, and how to navigate conflicts as they arise. Participants in this workshop will have the opportunity to offer their reflections and practice managing a disruptive room towards a positive outcome.

Campaigns 101: The Nuts and Bolts of Building a Winning Strategy
Workshop led by

It can be easy to identify the issue that we want to organize a campaign around, but where do we go from there? In this workshop, you’ll hear from leaders in the transit justice, immigrant justice, jail justice and climate justice movements to see how they identified allies and targets, tactics, messaging and research needs in their respective campaigns, and built a solid plan to win. Participants in this workshop will have the opportunity to collectively strategize on their own campaigns with these tools, or grapple with common scenarios together to develop an effective organizing campaign.


Presenter Bios!

Abhishek Viswanathan (back to Abhishek’s workshop)

Abhishek Viswanathan is an immigrant from Mumbai, teaching Data Science at Chatham University, researching environmental conditions in Pittsburgh, and organizing with friends and comrades at Against Carceral Tech (ACT) and other places.

Alisa Grishman (back to Alisa’s workshop)

Alisa Grishman is a disability activist and founder of Access Mob Pittsburgh, an advocacy group that utilizes positive approaches to making change, such as education and economic incentives. A self-described shameless agitator, Grishman has also been arrested multiple times fighting for disability rights with ADAPT, a national advocacy group. Her work has been recognized locally and nationally in such outlets as the Rachel Maddow Show, NPR, Huffington Post, Esquire Magazine, WTAE, KDKA News, and the Pittsburgh Post Gazette.

Along with her direct advocacy work, Grishman co-runs Ballots for Patients and Care to Vote, sister efforts that respectively collect emergency absentee ballots from hospitalized peoples on election day and work with nursing and personal care homes to help residents register to vote and fill out ballots. She also sits on the board of directors of the Keystone Progress Education Fund.

In her free time, Grishman enjoys knitting and collecting antique books. She lives in the Uptown neighborhood of Pittsburgh, PA.

Bemi Byrd (back to Bemi’s workshop)

As a Transportation Community Organizer at No Boundaries Coalition, I led grassroots efforts to elevate transportation equity in Central West Baltimore. I created and led the initiative “Put Your SEAT Where Your Mouth Is,” bringing elected officials and residents together to ride public transit and engage in a town hall that translated lived experience into policy-driven dialogue. I built strategic relationships with local and state officials, including direct engagement with the Secretary of Transportation. I met with the Administrator of MTA to advocate for improved operations and maintenance of our transit system. I also developed a monthly transportation flyer to keep residents informed and involved.

My advocacy extended to speaking at Delegate Robbyn Lewis’ City 4 All forum, organizing transportation for community members to the Transit Riders Rally in Annapolis as well as speaking at that rally, and testifying at MTA House and Senate hearings in support of Governor Moore’s transportation budget. My work reflects a deep commitment to community empowerment, equitable transit solutions, and building bridges between residents and decision-makers.

Connor Chapman (back to Connor’s workshop)

Connor Chapman is a labor/community organizer and researcher based in Pittsburgh, PA. A member of PPT’s organizing committee, he serves as an organizer with Pittsburghers for Public Transit’s Transit Worker Fellowship, which aims to bring transit workers and transit riders together. Committed to building strong labor-community coalitions, Connor believes that robust connections between Pittsburgh’s transit workforce and ridership will be key to maintaining and expanding public transit service. He also organizes with the Pitt Graduate Workers Organizing Committee, where he helped secure union representation for 2,300 graduate workers at the University of Pittsburgh.

Connor Descheemaker (back to Connor’s workshop)

Connor Descheemaker has over a decade of experience building and facilitating diverse coalitions to achieve policy change, support local communities, and provide professional education and development. Born in Phoenix, they came of age just as that famously-sprawling metro opened its first light rail line in 2008, and their exploration of a changing downtown ignited their interest in mobility and community in urban areas. There, they ran multiple all-ages art and performance spaces, and founded a business coalition to support walkable, sustainable, and affordable urban development. After four intermediary years in Seattle supporting architects in their professional development, and housing and transportation advocacy, they arrived in Philadelphia in 2022 to manage the Transit Forward Philadelphia coalition. There, they grew the group to 35 community-based organizations covering environmental justice, immigrant and refugee support, community development, political advocacy, and elder and disability rights.

Daeja Baker (back to Daeja’s workshop)

Daeja Baker is a long-time organizer and poet from the North Side of Pittsburgh. She founded Pittsburgh Feminists for Intersectionality (PFI) in 2017, an organization that does community education, mutual aid, and resource gathering across Allegheny County. Daeja often organizes at the intersections of disability rights, mental health, racial justice, queer rights, and abolition. Daeja has worked on numerous state and county level political campaigns and currently works as a political consultant. She believes that our collective liberation rests in the power that individuals bring in coalition with one another. Daeja organizes with the belief that rest is radical; rest is liberation; and that nothing happens in a movement without collective care. Be well.

Evelyn Ulysse (back to Evelyn’s workshop)

Hello, my name is Evelyn Ulysse. I’m part of the Latino community in Pittsburgh. I ride public transit, and I care about it because it’s a system that helps the most vulnerable people get around the city to perform basic life activities, such as going to work, school, medical appointments, grocery shopping, and recreational activities. I’m passionate about photography and participating in projects that improve the quality of life.

Hola mi nombre es Evelyn Ulysse soy parte de la Comunidad Latina en Pittsburgh PA, Soy usuaria del transporte público y me importa porque es un sistema que ayuda a la clase más vulnerable a desplazarse por la ciudad para realizar sus actividades básicas para la vida como ir al Trabajo la Escuela Citas médicas, comprar alimentos y actividades recreativas.
Me apasiona la fotografía y participar en proyectos que aporten mejoras a la calidad de vida.

Erik Oas (back to Erik’s workshop)

Erik lives in Lawrenceville with his wife Laura and dog Ubba. He is a California native who spent seven years calling minor league baseball games on the radio before beginning his current work in and around political campaigns. Erik’s first campaign was Bernie Sanders 2020 run where he worked as a Field Organizer and Advance Team Member before moving to Pittsburgh in June of 2020. Since then, he has worked on numerous electoral and public pressure campaigns at all levels with a commitment to building power for poor and working people. A believer in organizational homes, Erik organizes with the Pittsburgh Chapter of Democratic Socialists of America (DSA).

Faith Walker (back to Faith’s workshop)

Faith Walker is the Executive Director of RVA Rapid Transit, Virginia’s only public transportation advocacy organization. She first joined the team as Director of Community Engagement and now leads efforts to create a more connected, equitable Richmond region through expanded and accessible transit.Under Faith’s leadership, RVA Rapid Transit has championed the region’s Zero Fare program for the past five years, ensuring transit remains a vital tool for racial equity, economic mobility, and public health. She has helped grow impactful initiatives like the Adopt-A-Stop program, which empowers community members to reimagine and care for bus stops; Riders Voice, which amplifies the lived experiences of daily transit users in policy conversations; and Mobility University, a five-week training series that equips residents to advocate for better public transportation in their neighborhoods.With a strong foundation in artistic marketing, creative outreach, and grassroots organizing, Faith bridges community, culture, and policy to advance healthy, people-centered transit solutions across the region.

Gabriel McMorland (back to Gabriel’s workshop)

Gabriel McMorland (She/her) has been active with PPT since 2015 and is currently on the PPT board. She previously worked at the Thomas Merton Center, an activist organization where she led power-mapping workshops and organized campaigns on a variety of issues. She’s a blind/Disabled transwoman who dreams of sidewalks and transit so accessible that we can all move on to more poetic pursuits.

Gregory Williams (back to Gregory’s workshop)

Gregory Williams serves as the Advocacy Campaign Organizer at Bike Durham, where he champions equitable and sustainable transportation initiatives. He’s been with Bike Durham for a little over a year now and brings with him over a decade of experience in political fundraising, organizing, operations, and civic engagement. In addition to his dedication to advancing social justice and democracy through improved transit solutions he is an avid musician, father, and sustainable technology enthusiast.

Joel Batterman (back to Joel’s workshop)

Joel Batterman (he/him) grew up in Michigan, went to college in Oregon, and returned to the Great Lakes State hoping to bring more public transit to America’s automotive heartland. He helped found Transit Riders of the US Together, a national network of transit rider organizations, and currently works as Campaigns Manager for Detroit’s Transportation Riders United. Joel has experience organizing with MOSES, the Motor City Freedom Riders, and the Graduate Employees Organization, among other groups. He lives in Detroit with his wife, cat, and son.

Laura Perkins (back to Laura’s workshop)

Laura has been carless for 4 years, and a Pittsburgh for Public Transit member for 5. As a community organizer with Pittsburgh’s Latino immigrants, she worked with PPT on various campaigns to make our public transit system more accessible to immigrants.

Monika Wheeler Hanna (back to Monika’s workshop)

Hi my name is Monika Wheeler Hanna, and I’m a Retired Instructor/ Supervisor from Pittsburgh Region Transit with 25 years of service, 15 years as an Operator and 10 years as an Instructor. I’ve been an Activist with Pittsburghers for Public Transit since 2011 and I’m a Transit Worker Fellow who acts as a Consultant on Work Place issues and PPT Campaigns. I like to travel with my GrandGirls to their Cheer Competition.

Morgan Cikowski (back to Morgan’s workshop)

Morgan is the Activism Team Lead at Patagonia Pittsburgh, where she partners with local organizations to host meaningful events—like book talks, film screenings, and community conversations—and helps amplify their messages through social media and in-store storytelling.

Her passion for local advocacy runs deep. As a former intern and active member of Pittsburghers for Public Transit, she’s spent time canvassing, speaking at PRT board meetings, and conducting bus stop audits to support more equitable transit.

When she’s not organizing or connecting with community partners, you’ll likely find Morgan enjoying time at the park with her dog, Frankie, or winding down with a cozy Animal Crossing session on her Switch.

Patrick McGinty (back to Patrick’s workshop)

Patrick McGinty teaches writing at Slippery Rock University, where he chairs the Committee for Action through Politics for the faculty union (APSCUF). His first novel, Test Drive, was about how driverless cars don’t really solve transit issues in Pittsburgh. Like, at all.

Paul Vereb (back to Paul’s workshop)

I’m Paul Vereb, a Pittsburghers for Public Transit Fellow and a recently retired Light Rail Transit Systems Supervisor for Pittsburgh Regional Transit. My position included supervising three different disciplines under the umbrella of one department called Power and Signal. I spent 30 years in the light rail field working with crews who maintained the power distribution, overhead catenary infrastructure, and signaling assets for the Allegheny County Trolley system, the T, where I learned the importance of teamwork, experience, and collective ideas in the process of job performance. Working with PPT has given me insight to the needs of our riders and fellow employees and the obstacles that we face in light of inconsistent funding and service delivery. I believe these are things that can be righted using our collective voices, experience, and teamwork.

Seth Bush (back to Seth’s workshop)

Seth Bush is the Advocacy Manager at Bike Pittsburgh where he coaches, trains, and resources leaders of neighborhood biking & walking advocacy groups or “bike/ped committees” across Pittsburgh and Allegheny County. Seth is a graduate of the America Walks Walking College Fellowship and a Professional Certified Coach for social change leaders with over 15 years of experience in grassroots organizing. When he’s not helping neighbors transform their streets, you can find Seth walking his dog around his neighborhood in Swissvale, gardening, or binge-watching Star Trek. Contact him at seth@bikepgh.org.

Tom Conroy (back to Tom’s workshop)

Tom Conroy is a retired bus driver for Pittsburgh Regional Transit and former Union board man for Amalgamated Transit Union local 85 at the Collier garage in Pittsburgh. He is a long time member and supporter of Pittsburghers for Public Transit and Union activist.

Shay Singh (back to Shay’s workshop)

Shay (they/he) is a soccer coach, union barista and member of Starbucks Workers United, and a transit advocate based out of Cleveland Heights, Ohio. They are a co-founder of Clevelanders for Public Transit, and formerly served as staff for the Amalgamated Transit Union to prevent service cuts and layoffs in Cleveland.

Stevie Pasamonte (back to Stevie’s workshop)

Stevie Pasamonte is an organizer focused on building grassroots power at the intersection of mobility, climate, and racial justice. As the chair of Transit Columbus, they helped win a major funding increase for central Ohio public transit, sidewalks, and bikeways, and built coalitions to champion the city’s first complete streets policy. Stevie draws from their experience as a grassroots advocate and lifelong public transit rider in their work with the National Campaign for Transit Justice.

Apply Today! New Mon Valley Transit Organizing Fellowship

image description: graphic has text that reads “Mon Valley Transit Organizing Fellowship” wth a photo of a PPT Member. Background has a gameboy-like illustration of people waiting at a bus stop.

Apply Today! PPT’s New Organizing Fellowship Will Train More Transit Advocates in the Mon Valley

No matter what place you call home, everyone in Allegheny County deserves safe, accessible, affordable, and reliable public transportation. However, a lack of investment in our public transit, environmental crises, increases in the costs of housing, and social inequity have led to many of our friends, families, and neighbors struggling to get to the places they want to go and disconnecting our communities rather than bringing them together. 

But we can take action to reverse it. That is why Pittsburghers for Public Transit (PPT) will launch a paid fellowship program for transit riders who live in communities located in the Mon Valley during Spring 2024. Participants will explore public transit access, infrastructure, financial barriers, and equitable development. Examples of these topics include; the opportunities and need for more bus shelters and safe, accessible sidewalks to transit, improved service through Pittsburgh Regional Transit (PRT’s) Bus Line redesign process, winning and enrolling Mon Valley residents into Allegheny Go, and the zoning/land use relationship connecting access to housing and quality transit. 

Fellows will receive compensation for participating in the program for three hours per week for ten weeks until completion in June 2025, with a special invitation to Pittsburghers for Public Transit’s Spring Training event on April 26, 2025.

The fellowship will consist of weekly modules based on current PPT transit justice campaigns, within classroom learning and field work. The fellowship will begin in late March 2025 and end in early June 2025. 

Timeline Overview of the Mon Valley Organizing Fellowship

  • April 6th – application deadline
  • March 10th – fellows are confirmed
  • April 14th – class week 1
  • April 21st – class week 2
  • April 25th & 26th National Transit Advocacy Spring Training!
  • April 28th – class week 3
  • May 5th – class week 4
  • May 12th – class week 5
  • May 19th – class week 6
  • May 26th – class week 7
  • June 2nd – class week 8
  • June 3th – June 22nd – Meetings with elected officials
  • June 23rd – Graduation Party : )

Do you live in the Mon Valley and want to improve public transit for your community? Apply today by sending your resume and answers to the following questions to cheryl@pittsburghforpublictransit.org

To apply to the Mon Valley Transit Organizing fellowship, send answers to the following questions to cheryl@pittsburghforpublictransit.org. You can include a resume if you have one!

  1. Phone number
  2. Email
  3. Address
  4. Why is organizing for public transit important to you?
  5. How do you understand the connection between public transit and racial, economic, disability, and environmental justice? 
  6. Can you tell us about any past experiences, jobs, volunteer work, or leadership opportunities that have prepared you for this opportunity?
  7. What are you looking to accomplish through your participation with PPT’s Mon Valley Organizing Fellowship?

Tell Gov Shapiro: TRANSIT M♥VES US!

We’re Ready for a Budget that Moves Us! On February 4th, Rosa Parks’ birth date, we’re calling on Governor Shapiro to lay out a funding plan for the transit we deserve.

Thank you Governor Shapiro for hearing our call to flex funding and save SEPTA. Now it’s time for you to put transit first, and negotiate a dedicated, sustainable transit funding solution for all Pennsylvanians in 2025.

Whether you’re from State College or Scranton, Philly or Erie, every Pennsylvanian deserves transportation access to opportunity. Organize with us on Rosa Parks’ birth date and Transit Equity Day to win public transit in every corner of our state.

This February 4th, 2025 is the annual Transit Equity Day, which is celebrated on civil rights leader Rosa Parks’ birth date. Transit Equity Day recognizes transit as a human right, central to the movements for racial justice, economic justice, disability justice and climate justice. This year, it falls on the same date as Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro’s budget address, in which he will lay out his funding priorities for the FY 2026 Budget. 

We’re ready for a state budget that moves us. On Rosa Parks’ birth date and Transit Equity Day, transit riders and workers across Pennsylvania are calling on Governor Josh Shapiro to announce his plan to win dedicated, expanded funding for public transit in his annual budget address. 

There are THREE things you can do to organize with us for transit that moves all Pennsylvanians:

  • First, send a letter to Governor Shapiro, to show him how important transit is to constituents all across the Commonwealth, and that there we’re ready to support him in winning funding for the service we deserve! >>Send your letter here & share it with your community
  • Second, we want to make it clear that transit makes our economy work!  Take a photo of yourself holding a sign to share with us and on social media! >>Here’s instructions for how to join the photo campaign
  • Finally, register to join our TRANSIT M♥VES US WATCH PARTY of Gov. Shapiro’s Budget Address We’ll have in-person coffee and donuts in Pittsburgh and Philadelphia, and have a livestream up for folks to join from home! Let’s show the state legislature that we’re paying attention and are ready for the transit funding fight this Spring! >>RSVP today and invite your folks!

How to take part in the TRANSIT M♥VES ME photo campaign to tell Gov. Shapiro transit must be a top priority!

Guidance for taking photos:

  • Write the sign in Sharpie or print from a digital doc
  • Sign should be horizontal
  • Font should be large and cover the entire page
  • Message is: I am a ____________ [insert job title] and transit moves me <3 
  • Hold it high: under your face
  • Photo should be taken in portrait orientation/vertically
  • Don’t take a back lit photo: Make sure the light source in the room is shining on you and the sign
  • If possible, have someone else take the photo so that nothing is left out of the frame
  • Take a couple photos so you can decide which one you like best and don’t forget to smile! 🙂

Once you have your photo:

  • Send your photo to Connor at connor@transitforallpa.org with a sentence or two about why you’re taking action!
  • Post it to social media with the following message:
    I am an essential worker and transit moves me!
    Hey @governorshapiro! Please include transit as a top priority in your budget address on Feb 4th.
    🚨 Take action with me and the @TransitPA campaign here: https://www.transitforallpa.org/tell-gov-shapiro-transit-moves-us/
    #transitequityday

RSVP to the watch party! All Eyes on Governor Shapiro to include transit as top priority in his 2025-26 Budget Address!

Join us as we call on Governor Shapiro to put transit at the top of his agenda for this Spring’s budget negotiations and hear his plans for funding the service we deserve on Transit Equity Day.

We will hold a watch party with coffee and donuts in Pittsburgh and in Philadelphia during this budget, with locations TBD. Register here to join the in-person fun, or get the link to join the watch party from the warmth of your own home!

NEW TOOLS: DIY Commute Calculator for Bus Line Redesign

image description: red background with white text that reads “New Advocate Tools! Commute Calculator” next to a logo for Pittsburgh Regional Transit’s Bus Line Redesign

New Commute Calculator tool From Our Research Committee Helps Riders See How Trips Will Be Impacted by Draft 1.0 of the Bus Line Redesign

Pittsburgh Regional Transit (PRT) is proposing a significant Bus Line Redesign that could dramatically change how transit riders travel across the County. We think it’s very important that transit riders have the ability to assess how the Bus Line Redesign (BLR) will impact our commute times. PRT does not provide a way to compare travel times under the current bus network to the proposed BLR Draft 1.0, although we at PPT believe that this is invaluable information for riders to consider.

Since BLR is still a draft, we urge transit riders and supporters to see how the BLR Draft 1.0 will impact your commutes and tell us about any changes that you see. Also give public comment to Pittsburgh Regional Transit before the deadline at the end of the month!

PPT’s Research Committee used our tool to model 21 example transit trips in Allegheny County to and from important neighborhoods and destinations to compare travel times: 19 of those 21 trips would take longer under the BLR Draft 1.0 than they do today under our current network, which is very concerning. Many of these trips are longer because they would require more transfers under the new proposal. You can see the math behind these example commute calculations here.

CLICK HERE TO JUMP to the 21 example commute trips!

USE OUR ADVOCATE COMMUTE TOOL: Compare how your current commute is impacted by Draft 1.0 of the Bus Line Redesign Proposal

People care how long their trip will take. It’s unfortunate that Pittsburgh Regional Transit doesn’t provide a way to measure how your commute time will change under their bus network proposal. Luckily, our Research Committee created a tool to let people do just that.

To make a commute time comparison between an existing PRT transit trip and the proposed Bus Line Redesign transit trip, follow these instructions: 

  1. Identify Your Route: Choose the starting point (e.g., your neighborhood intersection) and destination (e.g., an intersection, a key location like a workplace, hospital, grocery store, or transit hub).
  2. Enter it in Google Maps: Input the starting point and destination in Google Maps and adjust the route’s path according to the actual route and turns that the current bus takes. It is IMPORTANT to map your current route using the “driving” function of Google Maps (NOT the “transit” function!), in order to have an apples to apples comparison of the current route(s) against the proposed Bus Line Redesign route(s).  This is suggested because travel times for the proposed routes are not yet available.  It should be noted that actual transit travel times will likely be longer.
  3. Record Travel Details using Current Routes: Note the total travel time, number of transfers, and any walking required.
    1. Walking times from your origin to the bus stop, from the bus stop to your destination, or between buses related to a transfer can be assessed using the Google Maps “walking” function. 
    2. For all transfers you need to add a transfer time “penalty” that is equal to half of the frequency of the second or connecting route. So for instance, if you must make a transfer and the bus you are transferring onto comes once every 30 minutes, you should add a 15 minute transfer penalty to your total commute time.  This penalty represents the average wait time related to the transfer. 
  4. Repeat for Proposed Routes: Find routing information for proposed routes here: Bus Line Redesign | Engage PRT

Adjust your Google Maps input to reflect the new proposed route and again use the car or driving option, not the transit option to calculate times for the proposed trip.  Using the driving option for both the current and proposed trip will ensure a fair comparison.

  1. Compare: Copy a table or create a table with columns for the current and proposed routes, listing travel time, transfers, and walking distance. Highlight any key differences.
    1. Link to the table to view
    2. Link to the table to copy (must have a Google Account)

For example, if you wanted to look into a trip between 

  1. 4th St. & Braddock Ave. (Apartments) to Walmart Supercenter, using the 59
  2. Enter it into Google Maps, using “driving” mode
  3. Record travel details – this route is a 20 minute “drive”
  4. Repeat with the proposed route
  1. Find the new route under Draft Network 1.0 – Find My Route
    1. The 59 Mon Valley is being split into several different routes. At this stretch, it is the N68 and N63.
  2. Enter each part of the new route into Google Maps, using “driving” mode

Proposed Route N68:

Proposed Route N63:

  1. Adding the two bus trips together gives a total bus travel time of 18 minutes. However, the new N63 will only have service every 60 minutes–so the transfer penalty will be 30 minutes. In total, the new travel time will be approximately 48 minutes.
  2. Fill in the chart with the information for your current route (on the left) and your new route (on the right) under the BLR proposal:

In this way, you are able to calculate the impact of the proposed changes in the BLR Draft 1.0 for yourself. It is important to remember that this does not have to be perfect. And if you need any help in doing this at any time, feel free to reach out to PPT and we will be glad to figure it out with you!

PPT’s Research Committee modeled Draft 1.0 of the Bus Line Redesign impacts on 21 different trips. Here’s the results:

  1. Hill District (Centre+Kirkpatrick) to Waterworks (Giant Eagle) – Travel Time Would be Shorter Under BLR Proposal
  2. Children’s Hospital (Penn+44th) to Shadyside (Fifth Avenue+S Highland) – Travel Time Would be Longer Under the BLR Proposal
  3. Lower Lawrenceville (Penn+Butler) to South Side (S 18th+Sarah) – Travel Time Would be Longer Under the BLR Proposal
  4. Trafford (5th+Brinton) to Monroeville (Forbes Hospital) – Travel Time Would be Much Longer Under the BLR Proposal
  5. Beltzhoover (Gearing+Chalfont) to Shadyside Hospital (Centre+Cypress) – Travel Time Would Be Similar Under the BLR Proposal with Additional Walking
  6. Squirrel Hill (Forbes+Murray) to Robinson Town Center (IKEA) – Travel Time Would be Longer Under the BLR Proposal
  7. Homewood (N Homewood+Frankstown) to Squirrel Hill (Allderdice High School) – Travel Time Would be Much Longer Under the BLR Proposal
  8. Kennedy (Pleasant Ridge) to Lawrenceville (Butler+46th) – Travel Time Would be Longer Under the BLR Proposal
  9. Natrona Heights (Freeport+Spring Hill) to Downtown (LIberty+Smithfield) – Travel Time Would be Significantly Longer Under the BLR Proposal
  10. Carnegie Mellon University (Forbes+Morewood) to CCAC Boyce Campus – Travel Time Would be Longer Under the BLR Proposal
  11. West View (Center+Harvard) to California Kirkbride District (Post Office) – Travel Time Would be Longer Under the BLR Proposal
  12. Shadyside (Giant Eagle Market District) to Blackridge (Laketon+Graham) – Travel Time Would be Much Longer Under the BLR Proposal
  13. Bridgeville (Bank+Lesnett) to South Side (E Carson+S 18th) – Travel Time Would be Much Longer Under the BLR Proposal
  14. Marshall Shadeland District (Brighton+Marshall) to North Hills (Passavant Hospital) – Travel Time Would be Slightly Longer under BLR Proposal
  15. Fairywood (Broadhead Fording+W Prospect) to VA Hospital (O’Hara Township) – Travel Time Would be Longer and More Complex Under BLR Proposal
  16. Hazelwood (Second+Johnston) to Penn State McKeesport – Travel Time Would be Significantly Longer and More Complex under BLR Proposal
  17. Glen Hazel (Broadview+Johnston) to Greenfield (Giant Eagle) – Travel Time Would be Longer under BLR Proposal
  18. Edgewood Town Center (Giant Eagle) to Wilkinsburg (Montier+Laketon) – Travel Time Would Be Similar Under the BLR Proposal
  19. Morningside (Jancey+Greenwood) to North Side (Allegheny General Hospital) – Travel Time Would be Longer under BLR Proposal
  20. Brookline (Chelton+Freedom) to Propel Braddock Hills High School – Travel Time Would be Shorter Under BLR Proposal
  21. Stanton Heights (Stanton+Hawthorne) to Bloomfield (West Penn Hospital) – Travel Time Would be Longer under BLR Proposal

Hill District (Centre+Kirkpatrick) to Waterworks (Giant Eagle) – Travel Time Would be Shorter Under BLR Proposal

Current route: 48 minutes | Proposed route: 40 minutes (8-minute improvement) Current Route: (82, 1) | Proposed Route: (D81) 

Good news! Traveling from Centre & Kirkpatrick to Waterworks Giant Eagle would be slightly faster. The new route eliminates one transfer at Liberty+7th (Downtown), making your journey more straightforward.

Children’s Hospital (Penn+44th) to Shadyside (Fifth Avenue+S Highland) – Travel Time Would be Longer Under the BLR Proposal 

Current route: 12 minutes | Proposed routes: 25 or 38 minutes (potential increase of 13-26 minutes)

Current Route: (64) | Proposed Routes: (N94, D73) 

Caution! This route becomes more complicated. You’ll now need to walk more (from the Hospital to Liberty+Bloomfield Bridge) and make a transfer at Fifth+Shady which could significantly extend your travel time.  You could walk from Fifth+Shady to Fifth+ S Highland to save the transfer time.

Lower Lawrenceville (Penn+Butler) to South Side (S 18th+Sarah) – Travel Time Would be Longer Under the BLR Proposal 

Current route: 23 minutes | Proposed routes: 30 or 52 minutes

Current Route: (54) | Proposed Routes: (O99, O47) or (D88, D51) 

Significant variations here! One proposed route will have a 7-minute increase, while another adds nearly 30 minutes to your journey. Expect more walking and transfers at Fifth+Atwood (Oakland) or Smithfield+Fifth (Downtown) in both proposed scenarios.

Trafford (5th+Brinton) to Monroeville (Forbes Hospital) – Travel Time Would be Much Longer Under the BLR Proposal

Current route: 11 minutes | Proposed route: 88 minutes (an extraordinary 77-minute increase)

Current Route: (69) | Proposed Route: (N65, N63) 

Major Concern! This route sees a dramatic change. The new route involves a walk from Trafford to Haymaker Village and a transfer at North Versailles Walmart.  The required and significant walking (due to the removal of bus service in Trafford) will turn a quick trip into a lengthy journey.

Beltzhoover (Gearing+Chalfont) to Shadyside Hospital (Centre+Cypress) – Travel Time Would Be Similar Under the BLR Proposal with Additional Walking

Current route: 46 minutes | Proposed routes: 49 or 52 minutes

Current Routes: (44, 82) | Proposed Routes: (N84, D82) or (RED, D82) 

While only slightly longer overall, there is significant additional walking.  You will still have one transfer.

Squirrel Hill (Forbes+Murray) to Robinson Town Center (IKEA) – Travel Time Would be Longer Under the BLR Proposal

Current route: 61 minutes | Proposed routes: 78 or 85 minutes (an increase of 17-24 minutes)

Current Routes: (61C, 28X) | Proposed Routes: (X50, D29) or (X50, D25) 

Longer journey ahead! The new routes involve a Downtown transfer and slightly longer walking distances, potentially making your commute longer and less convenient.

Homewood (N Homewood+Frankstown) to Squirrel Hill (Allderdice High School) – Travel Time Would be Much Longer Under the BLR Proposal

Current route: 16 minutes | Proposed route: 49 minutes (33-minute increase)

Current Route: (74) | Proposed Routes: (N92, N94) 

Significant time increase! The new route requires a transfer at Penn+Shady which will add more walking, and substantially more time to reach your destination.

Kennedy (Pleasant Ridge) to Lawrenceville (Butler+46th) – Travel Time Would be Longer Under the BLR Proposal

Current route: 47 minutes | Proposed routes: 57 or 66 minutes (10-19 minute increase)

Current Routes: (22, 91) | Proposed Routes: (N22, GREEN, D91) or (N22, D21, D91)

Longer journey ahead! The new routes involve more walking, an additional transfer and more complex navigation.

Natrona Heights (Freeport+Spring Hill) to Downtown (LIberty+Smithfield) – Travel Time Would be Significantly Longer Under the BLR Proposal

Current route: 54 minutes | Proposed routes: 89 or 104 minutes (an extraordinary 35-50 minute increase)

Current Route: (P10) | Proposed Routes: (N1, PURPLE) or (N1, D5) 

Major Time Increase! Riders will now face a transfer either at East Liberty Station or Harmar Garage, significantly longer travel times, and more complicated routes.

Carnegie Mellon University (Forbes+Morewood) to CCAC Boyce Campus – Travel Time Would be Longer Under the BLR Proposal

Current route: 50 minutes | Proposed routes: 65 minutes (15-minute increase)

Current Route: (67) | Proposed Routes: (D70, N72) or (D70, N77) 

Travel Times Will Increase. The route requires a transfer at Wilkinsburg Station and walking, with both possible options taking roughly the same time.

West View (Center+Harvard) to California Kirkbride District (Post Office) – Travel Time Would be Longer Under the BLR Proposal

Current route: 17 minutes | Proposed route: 33 minutes (nearly doubled travel time)

Current Route: (13) | Proposed Route: (N17, D16) 

Significant Time Increase! The new route introduces a transfer at Lincoln+Balph and additional walking.

Shadyside (Giant Eagle Market District) to Blackridge (Laketon+Graham) – Travel Time Would be Much Longer Under the BLR Proposal

Current route: 19 minutes | Proposed route: 52 minutes (33-minute increase).

Current Route: (P78) | Proposed Route: (PURPLE, N77) 

Major Time Increase! Transfer at Wilkinsburg Station will substantially increase travel time.

Bridgeville (Bank+Lesnett) to South Side (E Carson+S 18th) – Travel Time Would be Much Longer Under the BLR Proposal

Current route: 43 minutes | Proposed route: 63 minutes (20-minute increase)

Current Routes: (41, 51) | Proposed Route: (N33, GREEN, D51) 

Significant commute time Increase! There will be an additional transfer, one at Carnegie Station and the second at Sixth+Wood complicating what was previously a more direct journey.

Marshall Shadeland District (Brighton+Marshall) to North Hills (Passavant Hospital) – Travel Time Would be Slightly Longer under BLR Proposal

Current route: 68 minutes | Proposed route: 74 minutes (6-minute increase)

Current Routes: (16, 12) | Proposed Route: (D16, D2) 

Small Increase in Commute Time. There would be a change to the commute time in this scenario, and a change in the transfer location. 

Fairywood (Broadhead Fording+W Prospect) to VA Hospital (O’Hara Township) – Travel Time Would be Longer and More Complex Under BLR Proposal

Current route: 81 minutes | Proposed routes: 96 or 98 minutes (15-17 minute increase)

Current Routes: (27, 91) | Proposed Routes: (N22, GREEN, D5, N92) or (N22, GREEN, PURPLE, N92) 

Longer Journey. Requires two additional transfers (or four buses), increased walking, and more complex routing.

Hazelwood (Second+Johnston) to Penn State McKeesport – Travel Time Would be Significantly Longer and More Complex under BLR Proposal

Current route: 23 minutes | Proposed route: 65 minutes (42-minute increase).

Current Route: (56) | Proposed Route: (D52, X50, N56) 

Significant Time Increase! This would be a substantially longer trip with two transfers, one at E 8th+Ann (Homestead) and the other at Lysle+Evans (McKeesport).

Glen Hazel (Broadview+Johnston) to Greenfield (Giant Eagle) – Travel Time Would be Longer under BLR Proposal

Current route: 10 minutes | Proposed routes: 13 or 36 minutes (slight to significant increase)

Current Route: (93) | Proposed Routes: (O53, D44) or (O53, X50) 

Mixed Results: One proposed route requires a transfer at Browns Hill+Imogene (with the need to cross busy Browns Hill Road), while the other adds substantial time requiring a transfer at Hazelwood+Osprey.

Edgewood Town Center (Giant Eagle) to Wilkinsburg (Montier+Laketon) – Travel Time Would Be Similar Under the BLR Proposal

Current and Proposed route: 41 minutes

Current Routes: (71, 79) | Proposed Route: (X61, X60, N79) 

No additional time, but an additional transfer.  Despite additional walking and two transfers, one at Forbes+S Braddock (Frick Park) and the other at Penn+Center (Wilkinsburg), the overall travel time remains the same.

Morningside (Jancey+Greenwood) to North Side (Allegheny General Hospital) – Travel Time Would be Longer under BLR Proposal

Current route: 40 minutes | Proposed routes: 49 or 53 minutes (9-13 minute increase)

Current Routes: (87, 54) | Proposed Routes: (D96, D5) or (D96, D12) 

Longer Trip Ahead!  This commute becomes more complex and longer with additional walking and new transfer locations depending on the chosen option, one at Freeport+Western (Aspinwall) or the other at Liberty+7th (Downtown).

Brookline (Chelton+Freedom) to Propel Braddock Hills High School – Travel Time Would be Shorter Under BLR Proposal

Current route: 81 minutes | Proposed route: 75 minutes (6-minute decrease)

Current Routes: (39, P68) | Proposed Route: (D39, D64) 

Slight commute time improvement. An instance of travel time becoming shorter, but there would be increased walking time.

Stanton Heights (Stanton+Hawthorne) to Bloomfield (West Penn Hospital) – Travel Time Would be Longer under BLR Proposal

Current route: 12 minutes | Proposed routes: 29 or 32 minutes (17-20 minute increase)

Current Route: (87) | Proposed Routes: (D87, D88) or (D87, N79) 

Significant Time Increase! A transfer would be required either at Penn+Negley or at N Negley+East Liberty Boulevard and additional walking will increase travel time.

Our conclusion? Riders have reason to be concerned.

In the 21 examples the proposed Bus Line Redesign Draft 1.0 predominantly increases travel times, introduces more transfers, and requires additional walking. Under Pittsburgh Regional Transit’s Bus Line Redesign (BLR) Draft 1.0, many riders could expect to have longer, more complicated commutes. We recommend reviewing specific changes to the routes you ride to understand how your daily travel might be impacted. We highly encourage leaving a comment on the Bus Line Design website Bus Line Redesign | Engage PRT or by calling PRT’s Customer Service Line at (412) 442-2000 or by sending an email at BusLineRedesign@RidePRT.org to ensure that your feedback is heard by PRT.

NEW TOOLS to Evaluate Draft 1.0 of PRT’s Bus Line Redesign & See Biggest Changes

image description: red graphic with white font that says “New Advocates Tool! Evaluate Impacts” with a logo of Pittsburgh Regional Transit’s Bus Line Redesign.

PPT Research Committee Launches New Community Evaluation & DIY Tools to Understand Impacts of Draft 1.0 of Bus Line Redesign

We at Pittsburghers for Public Transit are organizing for a Busline Redesign that Works for All, and to do that, we know that it is very important for transit riders to be able to understand and provide feedback on Pittsburgh Regional Transit’s Proposed Bus Line Redesign Draft 1.0.

The Bus Line Redesign is enormously complicated, and will change almost every aspect of riders’ transit trips: PRT’s Bus Line Redesign will redraw where almost every bus route will run, how frequently buses come and how early in the morning and late at night buses will operate. Adding to the confusion, PRT is also proposing to rename all the bus routes and eliminate many bus stops across the County. That’s a lot for folks to pay attention to!

If you’re interested in evaluating your bus commute times under PRT’s proposed Busline Redesign 1.0 compared to your current transit trip, you can use our >>Bus Line Redesign DIY Commute Calculator tool here.

High-level evaluation of how some communities’ transit service will be impacted by Draft 1.0 of the Bus Line Redesign

Our Research Committee has been doing a deep dive into how the PRT’s Bus Line Redesign proposal will impact communities. Below, we have highlighted communities and corridors (not specific commutes or trips from A to B) that will see substantial transit service cuts with no proposed replacement routes under the Bus Line Redesign 1.0, and highlighted where neighborhoods will lose direct transit service to other communities or particular destinations under the PRT Bus Line Redesign Draft 1.0. 

Below, where we write “losing direct service” it means just that– the listed destinations would no longer be able to be reached directly on one bus (otherwise known as a “one-seat ride”) under the proposed redesign, but it may be possible to reach those destinations with a transfer. However, it is important to recognize how adding a transfer adds uncertainty and longer commute times to transit trips, and increases wait times in the elements.

Finally, the list below is not a comprehensive list of the changes from the current bus network with the proposed Bus Line Redesign- for instance, we are not laying out proposed improvements to routes, nor are we evaluating service frequency or service span changes. In a few weeks, we will publish a route-by-route comparison of the current system that notes service improvements, accessibility and safety concerns, and service frequency and span changes.

We also are not claiming that these proposed Bus Line Redesign Draft 1.0 service changes are all bad- it’s very possible that these parts of the transit routes have very low ridership, and so this service can be re-allocated to different places without much concern. However, we believe that the Bus Line Redesign must grow ridership, grow transit service in marginalized communities, and make transit trips faster and more direct, and this is a resource to evaluate whether the Bus Line Redesign Draft 1.0 will do that, or not.

So take a look at how the Bus Line Redesign would affect your community below, let PRT know what you think, and sign on to support PPT’s Vision for a Bus Line Redesign for All! You can also let us know at info@pittsburghforpublictransit.org if we’ve missed other important impacts that you see with the Bus Line Redesign Draft 1.0.

Click the community to jump to the impacts:

Baldwin Borough/Whitehall

  • Service along the current Y45 is almost completely eliminated, with no replacement.
  • Loss of Y47 service along Brownsville Rd between Provost Rd and Knoedler Drive.
  • Complete loss of 44 service in Baldwin on Agnew Rd, Custer Ave, Spencer Ave and Churchview Ave, with no fixed route service replacement. 

PRT’s proposed Bus Line Redesign replacement routes of D46 and D49 are inaccessible by foot in the neighborhood. A previous 5-10 minute walk to a bus stop will now involve a harrowing half hour walk along a busy road without sidewalks, making the area highly inaccessible by transit. Furthermore the replacement bus service being offered now results in a much longer commute going through Century Square and Prospect Park.

Residents were already struggling with overcrowded buses on the Y45, because of service reductions over the past several years.

Beltzhoover

  • Elimination of 44 service in Beltzhoover along Climax St, Gearing Ave and Chalfont St, with no replacement fixed route transit service in those neighborhoods.

Bloomfield

  • Loses 87 service altogether.
  • Loses direct 54 service to North Oakland, South Side & Slopes, Mount Oliver, Knoxville, Bon Air, Allentown & Beltzhoover.
  • Loses direct 64 service to Shadyside and Chatham University.
  • Loses direct 87 service to Morningside, Stanton Heights & Upper Lawrenceville. 
  • Loses direct 93 service to Greenfield, Hazelwood & Glen Hazel. 
  • Loss of all 54 & 71C on Centre Avenue service with no proposed increase in 71A (O95) service ensures overcrowding and pass-ups in this busy transit corridor.
  • Reroutes 64 service away from the entrances to West Penn Hospital & Children’s Hospital.

Bon Air

  • Complete removal of 54 routing (and all bus service) from Bon Air.

Brackenridge

  • Elimination of P10 service. Proposed transit service replacement is serving a different portion of the community.

Pittsburgh Regional Transit’s proposed Bus Line Redesign shifts bus service to the River Ave portion of the community (on the proposed N1) from the current Freeport Road and 9th Ave vicinity.

Braddock

  • Loses direct connection to the Waterfront. Proposed service will require a transfer at Swissvale Station. 

The routes in this region are all being broken up and reassembled into different routes connecting to different places, so there will be substantial impacts to current riders.

Braddock Hills

  • Loss of P68 service on Brinton Rd between Ardmore Blvd and Yost Blvd, with no replacement transit service.

The routes in this region are all being broken up and reassembled into different routes connecting to different places, so there will be substantial impacts to current riders.

Carnegie/Scott Township

  • Loss of G31 service on 3rd Street and Caruthers Ave between Carnegie & Heidelberg, with no replacement transit service on that corridor. 

Chalfant

  • Loss of P76 service on Ardmore Blvd and US 30 between Yost Blvd and State Rt 48, would be discontinued. 
  • Additional loss of current 69 service and loss of 59 service leaves this community with no remaining transit service under the Bus Line Redesign proposal. 

Corliss/Crafton Heights 

  • Loss of service along Middletown Road, Ladoga St, Faronia St, and Jeffers St with the elimination of the 27 bus.

Creighton

  • Loss of both the 1 and the P10, which leaves the community entirely without transit service.

Friendship

  • 87 service on Friendship Avenue is eliminated altogether.
  • Loses direct 87 service to Morningside, Stanton Heights & Upper Lawrenceville.
  • Loss of all 71C on Centre Avenue service with no proposed increase in 71A (O95) service ensures overcrowding and pass-ups in this busy transit corridor.

Glassport 

  • Loses the direct connection with North Versailles Walmart

Greenfield

  • Loses fast, direct service to Downtown via 2nd Ave (instead routing Downtown service through a longer route via Oakland).
  • Loses direct connections to Homestead, Lincoln Place, Munhall, West Mifflin, most of the Squirrel Hill business district, Duquesne and Walmart in Century Square by eliminating the current 52L, 53L, 65 & 93 service.
  • Eliminates bus service on lower Greenfield Avenue between Ronald St and Irvine St, currently served by the 58.
  • Eliminates bus service on Winterburn Ave and Bigelow St, without replacement.

The Busline Redesign team claims that the geography and topography of the neighborhood makes service challenging, which is the exact reason that residents are asking for accessible transit, with steep hills and roads that are not very walkable. 

Hays/Lincoln Place

  • Hays will see the elimination of current 56 bus service along Mifflin Road, with no replacement transit service.

Hazelwood & Glen Hazel

  • Loss of direct 56 service to Hays, Dravosburg, McKeesport and Penn State McKeesport.
  • Loss of direct 93 service to Greenfield, Squirrel Hill, North Oakland, Bloomfield and Lawrenceville. 

Hill District (High Rise on Crawford/Bedford) 

  • Elimination of 81 service to Bedford & Crawford senior citizen highrise. 

The proposed replacement service will be rerouted to Centre Avenue, which residents are concerned is inaccessible given the mobility limitations of many residents in that complex. 

Homeville Section of West Mifflin & West Mifflin west of Duquesne

  • With the elimination of the 52L, Mifflin St and Cipher St in Whittaker, most of Homeville Rd in West Mifflin (all but 1 block), Pennsylvania Ave in the Duquesne Annex Section, and Conlin St will lose all transit service.

Homewood

  • 77 and 86 service will be combined into a single route D86, reducing service on Frankstown Avenue.
  • Direct service to Baum and Bigelow Boulevards will be discontinued.
  • D86 will operate to Penn Hills (to Alcoma Apartments only).  It will not operate to CCAC-Boyce.
  • D86 will stop running about 9 pm on Sunday with low service frequencies both Saturday & Sunday/Holiday. 

Knoxville

  • Elimination of the current 44 service in Knoxville along Charles Street and Knox Ave, with no fixed route transit replacement.

McCandless

  • Loss of all service on Peebles Rd between McIntyre Square and Sample Rd, with no replacement.
  • Loss of all service on Sample Rd, Presidential Drive to North Park and Hemlock, with no replacement

Mount Lebanon/Scott Township

  • Loses current 41 service on Bower Hill Road from Kane Blvd to Bridgeville.  
  • Eliminates some substantial portions of the current 36 bus, including all of Cedar Boulevard, and elimination of all transit service south of Cochran Road at Bower Hill Rd, including Gilkeson Rd and the Galleria. 
  • Loses current 38 service on Greentree Rd between Cochran Rd and Swallow Hill Rd, and 38 service between Swallow Hill Rd & Lindsay Rd, both without a proposed transit service replacement.

Mt Oliver

  • Elimination of 44 service in Mount Oliver on Penn Ave and St Joseph St, with no replacement.

Natrona Heights

  • Loss of commuter service to Downtown 
  • Loss of direct connections to places between the Tarentum Bridge and the New Kensington Bridge
  • Loss of direct connections to communities between Downtown and the Hulton Bridge, north of the Allegheny River.

North Oakland

  • Loss of all 54 & 71C service with no proposed increase in 71A (O95) service ensures overcrowding and pass-ups in this busy transit corridor. 

North Versailles/East McKeesport 

  • There will no longer be direct service from North Versailles and East McKeesport to Downtown, which is currently provided by the P76. 
  • Crestas Terrace will be further from transit service requiring a lengthier walk.

The routes in this region are all being broken up and reassembled into different routes connecting to different places, so there will be substantial impacts to current riders.

However, there are some notable improvements. There will be new service between Haymaker Village, Pitcairn, Wilmerding, North Versailles, Walmart, Braddock and Swissvale Station on the N65. There will also be new service on 5th Ave between McKeesport and East McKeesport on the N56, which will connect Penn State, McKeesport proper, Walnut St, Olympia Shopping Center and Versailles. North Versailles will get new service from Walmart on the N63 to Monroeville Mall and Forbes Hospital.

O’Hara Township (VA Hospital)

  • The VA Hospital will only be served by N92 from East Liberty. For many riders 3 buses and lengthy travel times may be required to reach the VA Hospital.

Penn Hills

  • Loss of all service (P16) along Universal Road, Long Road, Milltown Rd and Hulton Rd including to Hulton Arbors.

Polish Hill

  • Loss of 54 service resulting in the loss of direct service to North Side, the popular part of the Strip District, Bloomfield, North Oakland, Oakland, Bon Air.
  • Loss of 77 service along Bigelow Boulevard resulting in the loss of direct service to Downtown, Baum Boulevard, East Liberty, Penn Hills, Plum and CCAC-Boyce. This is an important connection to the Giant Eagle Market District.

For many in Polish Hill, walking to Herron Ave to catch the replacement service is not easily accessible because of the distance and the topography. Under this BLR Draft proposal, Polish Hill residents will have to transfer to go to the nearest grocery store, which is located only 1 mile away.

Reserve Township

  • Complete loss of current Route 4 service on Mount Troy Road and loss of all of the Route 7 service, with no transit service replacement. There is only a very small sliver of Spring Garden Rd that will retain service via the proposed D15.

Ross Township

  • Loss of all service between Siebert Rd and Peebles Road currently served by the 05, with no replacement.

Shadyside

  • Loss of all 54 & 71C service with no proposed increase in 71A (O95) service ensures overcrowding and pass-ups in this busy transit corridor. 

St Clair

  • Complete loss of 44 bus service in the St. Clair neighborhood on Mountain St, Fisher St, Schuler St and Kohne St, with no fixed route transit replacement. 

Summer Hill

  • Loss of service on Colby Street currently served by the 6, 7 and 15 with no replacement. There is also no appropriate bus stop location on Mt Pleasant Rd at Colby St.

Tarentum

  • Loss of fast, direct service to downtown currently served by the P10. 
  • There will no longer be service in West Tarentum along Freeport Rd, which are currently serviced by the 1 and the P10. 

Turtle Creek & Wilmerding (Airbrake Ave) & Trafford 

  • These communities will see the loss of bus service altogether, with no replacement. 

PPT’s Year of Victories!

What a year it’s been! I’m so proud of everything Pittsburghers for Public Transit achieved in 2024, especially given the challenges we faced. And we did it all thanks to our members. That’s PPT’s special sauce: we’re not just a public service organization, we’re a grassroots union of transit riders, workers, and neighbors here in Allegheny County. 

When you become a member of PPT, you power our fight for an expanded, affordable, and accessible public transit system that serves all of us, with no communities left behind.

Here are some highlights of our wins over the past year. As you read, remember that YOU are part of the WE that made it happen. In 2024, your membership, activism, and passion have carried PPT through to the finish line.

  • We brought our Representing Our Routes advocacy campaign to our legislators 
  • We celebrated Transit Equity Day on Feb. 5 
  • We launched our Community Audit of Bus Shelters
  • We created our McKnight Road Safety Petition to demand that PennDOT restore bus stops and improve pedestrian infrastructure on McKnight Road
  • We celebrated Transit Worker Appreciation Day on March 18 by canvassing, handing out candy, and gathering stories about service issues 
  • We won our fight to restart the City of Pittsburgh’s Complete Streets Advisory Group, which the city allowed to lapse in 2019
  • We mobilized 100+ transit riders, workers, and political leaders to rally with us and our partners in the Transit for All PA! Campaign in Harrisburg
  • We held a statewide Digital Day of Action on Earth Day on Apr. 22
  • We held our first-ever Spring Training for Members which brought activists from around the country together for a day of workshops and skill-building
  • We witnessed the rollout of the Allegheny Go low income fares program we’ve spent years advocating for
  • We held our Allegheny Go Launch Party at Trace Brewing with 60 of our coalition partners there to celebrate  
  • We and our partners in Transit for All PA! mobilized our communities to send hundreds of digital lobbying letters that upped the pressure on Governor Shapiro to fund transit
  • We partnered with Casa San Jose to host Transit Tours for new residents and show them the routes, despite closures on the Red Line.
  • We held our Summer Member Drive and elected a new Board of Directors. 
  • We won big when our own Bobbie Fan was appointed to the board of Pittsburgh Regional Transit.
  • We launched our Allegheny County Campaign for Visionary Transit Service, which sets goals for a future transit system that really works for people. 
  • We held our Summer Party which brought us together and brought in many new members.
  • We built up to our Week Without Driving by highlighting testimonials, gathering sign-ons, and building relationships with new partner organizations 
  • We continued our Community Audit of Bus Shelters and Transit Tours for new residents
  • We held our Week Without Driving from Sept. 30 to Oct. 7
  • We launched our PPT Movie Night, with a screening of the film “Union”
  • We started organizing our response to PRT’s Busline Redesign
  • We won $153 million in state funds to save SEPTA (Philly’s public transit system) through our letter-writing and phone-banking campaigns
  • We launched our worker organizing fellowship with four fellows: James Hanna, Monica Wheeler, Tom Conroy, and Vincent Brandon
  • We overflowed our Zoom limit in our monthly meeting when we hosted PRT representatives to discuss the Busline Redesign
  • We won a first ever budget for bus shelters and transit infrastructure from the City Council
  • We convinced Pittsburgh to establish a partner pass program that provides bulk bus passes to municipal employees
  • We stood with our partners in the housing justice community to advocate for affordable housing at city government 

These amazing wins are just the start. In 2025, we’re going to advocate for the Visionary Transit Service campaign we developed in August. We’re done with PRT cutting service and driving down ridership while claiming scarcity. It’s time to fund a community vision of what transit can and should be. It’s time to make PRT work for the people.

Join us in this fight! The minimum cost of joining is just $2.75, the same as one ride on PRT. And this year, the Posner Foundation has offered to match every contribution made during our Year End Member Drive up to $10,000. Turn your $100 into $200. Turn your $500 into $1,000! 

Ride with us today, and make your donation monthly!