art credit: Christina Acuna Castillo, Digital Organizer at Pittsburgh United
Developers want to spend $15Million on a super-sized parking garage instead of providing for real community needs: affordable housing, improved transit, healthy food access, safe streets. We say no.
The Giant Eagle Shakespeare site is a chance to reverse East Liberty’s legacy of gentrification and displacement. It is an opportunity to show what truly equitable transit-oriented communities can look like.
The site is across the street from the East Liberty Busway Station, and there are dozens of other high-quality transit lines that pass it frequently. It literally has some of the best service in the entire transit system. Yet, the developers want to spend $15,000,000 on a 500-space parking garage.
Over-building car parking in this dense, walkable, transit-rich, amenity-rich neighborhood would be misguided (…to put it lightly). More car parking will only lead to more driving, more traffic congestion, more expensive rents, more costly products, more pollution, and more dangerous streets. Studies have already shown that there are hundreds of unused, publically-subsidized parking spaces within a block of the site. Why should an entire community pay by trading their personal health, clean air, and quality of life for a new building’s overbuilt parking? Why spend millions on a luxury amenity like car housing when our neighbors need affordable housing? There is a better way to create community equity and you can help make it happen.
Advocates for affordable housing, public transit, and food justice are coming together to demand that the parking garage money, and other public/private dollars go towards increasing the affordability of the rents, providing free bus passes to residents, ensuring access to healthy food, and building out safe streets.
You can help support and shape these demands at these upcoming events. Sign up below and reach out with any questions, info@pittsburghforpublictransit.org
“We all rise up when we center those who are at the margins.” -Ms. Pearl Hughey, PPT Member
You can build this grassroots movement for transit equity, one that centers the leadership and value of those most marginalized. Donate today to push PPT’s rider-led advocacy towards our year-end goal of raising $10,000 and activating 200 new supporters.
Here is a story from Ms. Pearl about her work to defend and expand public transit:
My name is Pearl Hughey. I’m a lifelong resident of Rankin. For me, my family, and my neighbors, public transit is a lifeline to opportunity. Last year when the transit agency said our bus service in the Mon Valley would be cut by 50% because of new rapid transit between Oakland and Downtown, we knew our communities would be devastated. We knew we had to stand up for change.
Change doesn’t come without strategy and commitment. For 18 months we organized. We built a movement. We gained power.
When the transit authority made their final announcement, we saw all of our hard work pay off. We won and we won big! Not only would the cuts be reversed, but now this rapid bus corridor would speed up our buses too.
The fight isn’t over. We need to keep working so that everyone in the Mon Valley, Eastern Suburbs and Allegheny County has access to quality, affordable transit.
We designed a grassroots approach to transit planning—one that allows the people who are directly affected to set priorities. Now we need you to rise up with us in this campaign to help see it through. When we come together, we can win.
Pearl Hughey PPT Member East Busway Organizing Fellow
Your action will make it possible for more neighbors like Ms. Pearl to work with PPT’s Organizing Fellowship and win quality, affordable public transit for Allegheny County.
Your gift of any size—whether $5, $50, or $500—will go toward our goal of $10,000. Your voice in sharing this work will help toward our goal of activating 200 new advocates.
Near the beginning of September, the Port Authority unrolled a new Bus Stop Consolidation program. Their website reads;
Your bus stop is the welcome mat to our service. For a better transit experience, we plan to reduce the number of bus stops throughout our system to improve on-time performance while ensuring that you can safely and comfortably access our service.
Allegheny County has a lot of bus stops, often located very close together. We’re not against the practice of bus stop consolidation (because it can make buses faster), but we do know that eliminating stops generally makes it harder for riders to access transit. For some, it creates a minor inconvenience that is outweighed by the faster ride. For riders with limited mobility, however, it can create an insurmountable obstacle. So it’s important that our public agency is paying attention to the system’s most vulnerable users and their needs, so that we’re not improving efficiency at their expense.
How has the program scored so far?
Bus stops are critical points of entry into the transportation system that many riders’ lives depend on. The process should reflect the seriousness of what is at stake and should do all it can to ensure that the most vulnerable riders are not being left behind by stop removal.
It should go without saying that Pittsburgh and the surrounding municipalities need to invest in safe sidewalks, bus stop amenities, and crosswalks, and that would go a long way to ensuring that our transit system is accessible for all. However, it’s also important that Port Authority does not use those lack of investments as a reason to penalize their riders in the short term. Privileging stops with existing amenities like good sidewalks and bus shelters creates inequitable outcomes, because good sidewalks are more prevalent in wealthier communities, and many bus shelters have historically been placed in places with high advertising visibility and marketing value.
Instead, with a clear public process and opportunities for riders and operators to give input throughout, PAAC will create an altogether more equitable and effective outcome. And because we can walk and chew gum, members of the public can also take the opportunity to call on their City or municipality to ensure that we have safe and supportive streets and sidewalks around all our bus stops to encourage transit usage.
How to improve the process
We want to give PAAC a shout-out for having a phased approach to bus stop consolidation, which gives space to hear from riders and make improvements. We’re also glad that Port Authority says they’re looking to TransitCenter’s Bus Stop Balancing Report (even if they didn’t follow it, exactly). Finally, we see that PAAC listened to some feedback in its first round and made modifications on the proposed bus stop removals planned for the 51 and 16 routes. We’re hopeful we can get to a better place on this.
But giving feedback to a plan that’s already been created isn’t the same as giving input as an active collaborator to a program. With a few simple process improvements, Port Authority could ensure that this program is collaborative, equitable and effective.
The Math:
Clearly Defined Goals + Rider Input & Operator Input + Data + Draft Proposal + Feedback & Alterations = Good Decision Making
Over the last few weeks, PPT volunteers have ridden the 51, the 16, the 48 and the 88 to collect input from riders about which stops were important and how the process can be improved. Below are some key suggestions from local riders and operators on how PAAC can build on the process going forward:
BEFORE signs are posted at bus stops to be removed, Port Authority should:
PAAC should list the specific metrics that will be used to identify stops that will be removed. PAAC should score each stop according to these metrics to be transparent in what exactly drives decision-making. These metrics should include ridership data, half-fare & senior ConnectCard taps, number of wheelchair ramp deployments and the frequency with which a bus “kneels” at any given stop, as well as qualitative input like nearby amenities and the accessibility of adjacent bus stops.
Map social service agencies (i.e. food pantries, Department of Human Services facilities, social security/WIC/SNAP offices, and other locations used by marginalized and limited-mobility communities) and take them into account when creating a draft of which stops to remove. Talk to these agencies to get their input.
Communicate clear timelines around when public comment will be accepted, when preliminary stops identified for removal will be announced, and when the final decision on stop removal will be made. This feedback process should be iterative; collect input before and after the stops are identified for removal, and then make a final decision.
Use bus advertising space and the overhead announcement to relay information about the bus stop removal program and ask for feedback. Have comment cards on the buses for riders to give input on which stops are important and which ones are unnecessary and why.
Have the Port Authority staff making the bus stop removal decisions ride the affected routes and talk to bus operators and riders to identify both important and underused stops. Internally, Port Authority could publicize a meeting with the bus operators using posters and the scheduling committee to get the word out.
Make explicit commitments to prioritize bus shelter improvements on routes that are losing stops, or commit to providing more frequent service with the new efficiencies found through the process.
Provide information about bus stop removal in multiple languages and in pictures.
AFTER stops are removed, Port Authority should:
Report back to riders on the effect of the removal. Have the stop removals sped up the buses? How will savings be reinvested to benefit riders? How have they affected ridership?
Continue to collect rider and driver feedback. How are the stop removals affecting riders’ experiences?
Port Authority put lots of work into their new Bus Stop Guidelines. These guidelines include “Equity” and “Accessibility” (see page 10) in the metrics for identifying Bus Stop Need, alongside “Transit Agency Policy.” This is great work that PAAC should be proud of. But let’s follow these guidelines accordingly with the next 96 routes set for bus stop consolidation, and we won’t leave riders out in the cold.
Time and time again, we’ve been told that there is no money to make those plans a reality.
However, the City is now pushing forward a multi-million dollar mobility project instead of our communities’ solutions. The City’s Mon-Oakland Connector plan would build a roadway through Schenley Park for private companies to operate “micromobility” connections between the Universities and the Hazelwood Green development site.
Neighbors in these communities have put together an alternate plan thatcalls for investment in needs that have been documented for years. It’s time our public money and officials support these priorities.
Congratulations to the Northland Library, CCAC North, Crisis Center North and the hundreds of residents, political officials and businesses along the Perry Highway corridor who have kept up the advocacy for transit service to the corridor for the last five years! We are particularly grateful for the longtime support of the Ross Township Commission and Senator Randy Vulakovich and Senator Lindsey Williams who have taken up the torch over the years.
We know that access to the library, employment and higher education are critical needs that should be robustly served by public transit. You can check out the history of the Buses for Perry Highway campaign –the rallies, letter writing, and Port Authority testimony– here. We will always last ONE DAY LONGER. Sí se puede!
You can read more about the upcoming major transit service changes and learn about next steps in this recent Post Gazette article:
Port Authority to reroute some buses to service CCAC North and Northland Library
“More than five years after North Hills residents, businesses and organizations began lobbying for it, Port Authority will extend service to Community College of Allegheny County’s North Campus and the Northland Library in McCandless next March.
Port Authority announced changes for the 012 McKnight Flyer last week as part of a series of changes mostly involving extended weekend service to be implemented as part of the agency’s annual service review. The agency will take public input about the proposed changes before they begin March 15.”
During yesterday’s City Planning Commission meeting, Commissioners approved a zoning change that will allow for housing to be built at the Giant Eagle Shakespeare site next to the East Busway Station.
Before the vote was taken, Pittsburghers for Public Transit’s Community Organizer, Josh Malloy, and Director, Laura Wiens, gave testimony to talk about the importance of a site like this in building equitable transit-oriented communities. They joined affordable housing advocates and residents to call for a development that includes affordable housing and free transit for residents.
The zoning change is an important first step to building the equitable transit-oriented communities that we need to combat crushing traffic congestion, climate change, and our City’s housing crisis. In the coming weeks, PPT will continue to work with residents, advocates, and political leaders to encourage a development that better aligns with all of these goals. The goal is that by the time this development comes before City Council for approval, the developer has agreed to build less structured parking and direct the savings to increase housing affordability and provide free transit passes.
We need your voice in this campaign. Please reach out to get involved.
Check out this recent news coverage about the development:
Housing advocates urged Echo Realty and their partner Greystar to double the number of affordable units.
“We have been encouraged by the conversations we’ve been able to have” with the developers, said Celeste Scott, housing justice organizer for Pittsburgh UNITED. “We do think that this affordability target in a place like East Liberty, where there has been so much historical harm, is not asking too much.
Representatives from Pittsburghers for Public Transit proposed a way to pay for the increased affordability: reduce the planned amount of parking and use the savings to subsidize more units and provide transit passes.
“This is an opportunity to address several needs,” said Joshua Malloy, PPT’s community organizer. “Pittsburgh’s affordable housing crisis, congestion in East Liberty and Shadyside, underutilization of public transit in the area, and overbuilding of parking.”
Malloy cited a 2018 analysis by Jeanne Batog, a University of Pittsburgh graduate student, that found nearby parking lots experience 40 percent vacancy during peak hours.
Wiens says future developments in the area should be focusing on housing density and trying to limit the number of parking spaces built.
“It is a big opportunity,” says Wiens. “We need more density. It will encourage more people to use [transit]. When you build more parking, you [give] incentive for more cars to come into the neighborhood.”
Wiens also notes there is a lot of money that developers set aside for parking spaces. A paper by PPT argues that Shakespeare developers could save $4.6 million if they lowered the number of parking spaces to align with the zoning minimum requirements in East Liberty, which are one parking space for every two housing units. (The Shakespeare proposal is technically in Shadyside, where minimums are higher, but developers have convinced city officials to agree to a variance to lower them before.)
A 2014 UCLA study shows that above-ground parking garages as required by parking minimums increase the cost of the average U.S. project by 31 percent.
Wiens says it makes financial sense and would be a boost for economic equity in the area if less parking was built at the Shakespeare site, especially if the money saved was used to build more affordable units and/or supply residents with transit passes.
“When we are talking about over-building by hundreds of spaces, like in Eastside Bond and Target, that is millions of dollars,” says Wiens. “There is so much wasted space.”
She says this contributes units being unaffordable to residents, which is only exacerbated by the fact that these units are close to frequent and good public transit, which is more frequently used by low-income people.
“That money should go for free bus passes,” says Wiens. “If you have 30 people getting free bus passes, that lower demands for parking.”
Last month, the Port Authority announced its plan to eliminate bus stops on all its routes, starting with the 51 Carrick and 16 Brighton. Now they are moving onto the 88 and 48.
Pittsburghers for Public Transit knows that the best way to build a transit system is to engage the riders and operators who use it every day – they are the experts in how to improve it. And that means allowing riders to give input on the project and the process BEFORE a plan is drafted. PAAC needs to take this input into consideration as they draft their project plans because data and observation alone will not create the most equitable, effective outcome. PAAC also has to give riders space to give input AFTER the project has been implemented so they know what is working for riders and what isn’t. This has to be an ongoing conversation between the Port Authority, their riders, and their workers.
PPT is heading out to ride the buses and collect feedback from riders so we can pass it on to Port Authority. It is important that riders have a say in this process. We hope you’ll join us for these upcoming canvasses:
Wednesday, November 6th, 5pm-8p (Meet at the Crazy Mocha on Liberty Ave/Tito Way at 5pm).
Riders can visit the Port Authority’s website to learn more about the bus stop consolidation project and give their feedback. And check out this Post Gazette article from last month when the changes were announced.
Do Yinz use the 51 or the 16 bus routes? (or the 13, 15, 17, 19L, 48, 51L, 54, 55, 59, Y46, Y47, Y49?) Give your feedback now.
Starting this November, Port Authority is beginning its “Bus Stop Consolidation” program. What does that mean? Well, according to their website:
Your bus stop is the welcome mat to our service. For a better transit experience, we plan to reduce the number of bus stops throughout our system to improve on-time performance while ensuring that you can safely and comfortably access our service.
Yes, that means they are going to remove bus stops (between 25-30% of them), and they’re starting with the 51 Carrick and 16 Brighton. But because multiple routes use the same stop, these cuts will also affect riders on the 13, 15, 17, 19L, 48, 51L, 54, 55, 59, Y46, Y47, Y49.
Additionally, riders can give their comments to PAAC over the phone by calling 412-442-2000 during their normal business hours: weekdays 5:00am to 7:00pm, and weekends/holidays 8:30am to 4:30pm
Help PPT Collect Input from Riders
Unfortunately, Port Authority’s public engagement during this process has been lackluster. And it falls short of the commonsense bus stop consolidation outreach outlined by TransitCenter. Last month signs were posted at all of the stops that the Authority aims to eliminate. There was no prior outreach to the effected riders on the 51 or 16, nor the operators who drive those routes daily. No signage has been posted inside of these buses before or after the announcement. This is a missed opportunity and it sets the program off on the wrong foot.
Riders and operators need to be brought into the conversation early because they can help think through equitable, effective solutions for our systems. They have important lived-experience with which stops are extraneous and which are community-serving.
PPT is going out to ride the 51 and 16 to notify riders about the upcoming changes and collect their feedback to give to Port Authority. We hope you’ll join us for these upcoming canvasses to help build a system that supports its riders:
Saturday, October 26th, 10am to 1pm (Meet at the Crazy Mocha on Liberty Ave/Tito Way at 10am)
Wednesday, November 6th, 5pm-8pm (Meet at the Crazy Mocha on Liberty Ave/Tito Way at 5pm).
This is a great chance to fund the transit amenities that you and your neighbors deserve – bus shelters, benches, planters, trees, lean bars, lighting, trash cans, you name it. Check out the program details here.
The good news: neighborhoods can apply for up to $20,000 no questions asked! Neighborhoods can even apply for up to $100,000 if they find a local 2:1 match (for every two dollars of URA funding, there must be at least one dollar of local funding to the project.)
The bad news: unfortunately, the deadline is next week on October 1st. (Sorry for being late on this blog). If your neighborhood has a local Community Development Corporation or other organized groups, reach out to them and see if they have something planned. There’s a good chance that transit improvements could fit into their placemaking ideas. Or maybe there’s space to build your own proposal.
With transparency, wide-spread community collaboration, consensus, and buy-in, funding programs like this are a great opportunity to improve a neighborhood for those that live there and build transit ridership.
Ashleigh Deemer, Western PA Director for PennEnviroment’s Research and Policy Center, and Dean Mougianis, PPT Coordinating Committee Member, at Tuesday Morning Press Conference
On Tuesday, September 17th, Pittsburghers for Public Transit joined our allies PennEnvironment, PennFuture and the Clean Air Council to unveil a new report from PennEnvironment and PennPIRG: “Volkswagon Settlement State Scorecards“.
The report grades states on how they are using monies from the massive $4.3 Billion settlement paid by Volkswagon in 2016 after they were caught lying and cheating on their vehicle emissions tests. Nearly $3 Billion of that money was paid into an Environmental Mitigation Trust which was split amongst the states affected by VW’s fraud to be spent on “transportation projects that reduce pollution in an effort to mitigate the harm done by Volkswagen through their emissions cheating.”
The state of Pennsylvania received $118.5 Million from the Environmental Mitigation Trust fund. However, Pennsylvania’s performance has been lackluster (to put it kindly). Overall, the Scorecard report gave our state an “F”-grade on the way that our elected officials are spending the money.
Pennsylvania’s Environmental Mitigation Trust monies are an incredible opportunity to transition our state away from the dirty, gasoline/diesel-burning transportation that is our region’s largest contributor of greenhouse gas emissions. But we need a progressive, transparent, participatory vision to get us there – and that vision must include the transition towards a fully-electric public transportation system.
This is an urgent public health issue as well as much as it is an environmental issue. As PPT Coordinating Committee member Dean Mougianis puts it, “We know that transit workers and regular transit riders are disproportionately affected by the health risks posed by regular exposure to diesel emissions. According to the Union of Concerned Scientists, “railroad, dock, trucking, and bus garage workers exposed to high levels of diesel exhaust over many years consistently demonstrate a 20 to 50 percent increase in the risk of lung cancer or mortality…”. Beyond that, a very disturbing fact is that so many of our most transit-dependent citizens, the people who need the bus the most, are the very same people who live in areas most prone to respiratory illnesses caused or made worse by poor air quality. The bus, the vehicle that can take them out of the bad air should not be contributing to the bad air.”
The new PennEnvironment and PennPIRG study highlights that need. This is why PPT joined our allies in continuing our call that lawmakers take this opportunity seriously and create real plans to funnel this VW money into electric buses and charging infrastructure for public transit.
Read PPT Coordinating Committee Member Dean Mougianis’ full press conference comments below. And see the reporting from these local outlets for more information.
PPT Coordinating Committee Member Dean Mougianis speaking to press at Tuesday morning press conference
Press Conference Comments by PPT Coordinating Committee Member Dean Mougianis
Pittsburghers for Public Transit is a grassroots organization of transit riders, workers and residents that seeks to defend and extend public transportation. While we are happy at PPT that Pennsylvania will be receiving the benefit of funds from the VW mitigation settlement, we feel it is vital that those funds be used to bring us closer to a zero-emssions public transportation fleet. Put simply, the money should be used for more electric buses and other non-pollution-emitting infrastructure. What our transit advocacy work has taught us is that public transit affects a surprising number of areas of people’s lives beyond just transportation – everything from economic development to food security. Two of the most important of those areas are the health of the public and the state of the environment. We know that transit workers and regular transit riders are disproportionately affected by the health risks posed by regular exposure to diesel emissions. According to the union of concerned scientists “railroad, dock, trucking, and bus garage workers exposed to high levels of diesel exhaust over many years consistently demonstrate a 20 to 50 percent increase in the risk of lung cancer or mortality.” If that’s something we can do something about, then it’s something we should do something about.
Beyond that, a very disturbing fact is that so many of our most transit-dependent citizens, the people who need the bus the most, are the very same people who live in areas most prone to respiratory illnesses caused or made worse by poor air quality. The bus, the vehicle that can take them out of the bad air should not be contributing to the bad air.
One of the biggest things that motivate our work is the knowledge that increasing the use of public transportation is a big factor that can improve air quality and people’s health and reduce carbon emissions and tailpipe pollutants. Investing in electric buses can expand that great promise even further This is why it is so vital that Pennsylvania uses these funds not for more fossil fuel vehicles, but for zero-emissions solutions like electric buses and charging stations. It’s the right thing to do. Let us do right by the citizens of Allegheny county.
